[Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarct with or without a stent implant: the experience and results at 6 months in the first 200 patients]. / Angioplastica primaria nell'infarto miocardico acuto con o senza impianto di stent: esperienza e risultati a sei mesi nei primi 200 pazienti.

BACKGROUND: Although it is superior to thrombolysis, primary PTCA does have some limitations, both in hospital (recurrent ischemia and reinfarction due to reocclusion of the infarct-related artery) and at the six-month follow-up (high rate of late restenosis). Coronary stenting is a promising way of solving some of these problems, even if its use in patients with acute myocardial infarction could prove to be controversial because of intracoronary thrombus. In this study, we propose two procedural strategies in the treatment of the infarct-related artery (IRA): the search for optimal angiographic results after PTCA ("stent-like result"--SLR--with residual stenosis < or = 20%--no dissection--TIMI III flow) or intracoronary stenting when SLR was not obtained after a second inflation. METHODS AND RESULTS: From December 1995 to May 1998, 200 patients with AMI underwent direct PTCA or rescue PTCA because of failed thrombolysis. There were 143 men and 57 women, mean age 65 (range 36-84). Nineteen patients were in cardiogenic shock and 25 were in Killip class > II. Recanalization of the IRA was achieved in 196 patients (98%). In four patients, it was not possible to cross total occlusion with the guide-wire. SLR post-PTCA was achieved in 40 patients (20%). Stents were placed in 147 patients (75%), with "elective" implantation in 73 lesions because of suboptimal results after PTCA in 41, and early loss or coronary dissection with threatening occlusion in 33. In nine patients without SLR, stenting was not performed because of diffuse disease of the IRA. In-hospital complications included ten deaths (8 of 19 patients with cardiogenic shock at admission and 2 with multivessel disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction). None of the patients required emergency coronary bypass for procedural complications. One patient had a subacute thrombosis on the third day after bail-out stent implantation (re-PTCA). Five patients required elective bypass surgery to complete revascularization for multivessel disease with ten days after the surgical procedure. At the six-month follow-up, one patient had died of cardiogenic shock. Eleven (5%) patients with bail-out procedures underwent coronary bypass surgery or PTCA. Thirty-one patients (31/168) had recurrence of ischemia: 15 patients in the stent group, 11 in SLR group and 5 in the non-SLR group. Re-PTCA was performed in 20 patients, CABG in five and medical therapy in six. Other patients were angina-free at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our experience, seeking optimal angiographic results with or without (SLR) stent implantation is a safe and effective operative approach to achieve the best procedural and clinical outcome and reduce complications in patients undergoing PTCA for AMI.

[Clinical experience with the use of implantable vascular systems in advanced heart failure]. / Esperienza clinica di utilizzo dei sistemi per accesso vascolare impiantabili nelle cardiopatie in stadio avanzato.

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy frequently require acute or chronic infusional treatments and long hospitalization. Availability of a simple and safe vascular access is a true necessity for these patients, especially in case of inotropic or diuretic outpatient treatment. In this study we have evaluated the usefulness and the applicability of implantable vascular access in the management of end-stage cardiomyopathy. Technical problems and both short and long term complications have been analysed. METHODS: Nineteen implantable vascular system (16 Port-A-Cath, Pharmacia; 3 Celsite, Bruneau) have been implanted in a group of 15 patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy. All patients had been previously hospitalized and needed prolonged infusional therapy. Implantation was performed in local anaesthesia with technique derived from pace-maker implantation. RESULTS: All the interventions were well tolerated, average procedural time was 30 min (range 20-60 min). No procedural complications occurred. Re-implantation of the system was required in 2 patients due to catheter thrombosis, In 1 patient due to catheter rupture caused by wrong positioning of infusion needle, and in 1 patient due to inflammatory reaction. In 2 further cases catheter thrombosis was treated with local infusion of urokinase. In 1 patient the catheter was repositioned after dislocation. The average in situ permanence of the systems was 8 months (range 15 day-18 months). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular implantable systems have proved useful and easily applf1p4e in the management of patients with end stage cardiomyopathy. After training some of the implied complications are easily avoidable. The use of this device has concurred to reduce duration and frequency of hospitalizations.

Effects of lisinopril vs hydralazine on left ventricular hypertrophy and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in essential hypertension.

In order to compare the long-term effects on ambulatory blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy of hydralazine and lisinopril we studied 30 patients, all males, still hypertensive (diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 mm Hg) despite combined beta-blocker/diuretic therapy and with echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy (left ventricular mass index > or = 1.31 g.m(-1)). They wer randomized to receive hydralazine slow release 50 mg/ chlorthalidone 12.5 mg) for 6 months. Casual blood pressure, non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), M-mode echocardiogram, plasma renin activity and plasma catecholamines were evaluated before the randomization and after 6 months of treatment. Both drugs significantly reduced casual as well as daytime systolic and diastolic blood pressure, without statistical differences between the two treatments. Lisinopril was significantly more effective than hydralazine in reducing night-time systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Plasma norepinephrine was significantly reduced by lisinopril and increased by hydralazine. Left ventricular mass was significantly reduced by lisinopril but not by hydralazine. The results of linear regression and multiple regression analysis suggested that the lisinopril-induced decrease in both day- and night-time blood pressure might account for the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, whereas the lack of left ventricular hypertrophy regression during hydralazine treatment could be due mainly to the reflex sympathetic activation induced by the drug.

Left ventricular anatomy and function in normotensive young adults with hypertensive parents. Study at rest and during handgrip.

Using digitized M-mode echocardiograms, we evaluated left ventricular (LV) anatomy and function at rest and during handgrip in 24 normotensive young adults with both parents hypertensive (HP+), each matched for age, sex, body weight, and body surface area with one normotensive adult with both parents normotensive (HP-). LV parameters were within the normal range in all HP+ and HP-. At rest, HP+ as compared to HP- had higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), septal and posterior wall thickness, and LV mass; LV diastolic diameter and end-systolic wall stress were similar in the two groups. Modified midwall fractional shortening, peak shortening rate of LV diameter and peak thickening rate of LV posterior wall, indices of LV systolic function, and peak lengthening rate of LV diameter and peak thinning rate of LV posterior wall, indices of ventricular relaxation, were significantly higher in HP+. Handgrip induced significant (P < .001) and percent-comparable increases of systolic and diastolic BP, heart rate, and cardiac output in HP+ and HP-; peak shortening and lengthening rates of LV diameter and peak thickening and thinning rates of LV posterior wall increased significantly in HP-, whereas in HP+ the value of the four parameters, higher at rest as compared to HP-, did not show any further increase. In conclusion, normotensive young adults with high genetic risk for hypertension have higher BP and thicker and overactive LV as compared to subjects with normotensive parents. Handgrip stimulates LV function in offspring of normotensives, but not the already hyperkinetic LV of hypertensive offspring.

Evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring of efficacy of benazepril 20 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg fixed combination as compared to captopril 50 mg [corrected] plus hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg fixed combination in treating mild to moderate hypertension: a double-blind, within-patient, placebo-controlled study.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period cross-over, randomized study we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of benazepril 20 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (BN + HCT) as compared with the fixed combination of captopril 50 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (CP + HCT) by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Eighteen outpatients, 16 men and 2 women aged 41-58 years, were randomized to receive BN + HCT, CP + HCT, or placebo, all administered once daily for 4 weeks according to a three-period cross-over arranged in a 3 x 3 latin square design. Patients were checked after an initial 3-week washout period and every 4 weeks thereafter. At each visit, 24-h ABPM was performed by a noninvasive device (Spacelabs 5300); causal BP and heart rate (HR) were also measured. Both fixed combinations had a clear-cut antihypertensive effect in comparison with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fixed combination of benazepril and very low dose hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour non invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

A double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study was undertaken in order to assess the antihypertensive efficacy of a fixed combination of benazepril and hydrochlorothiazide in two different dosages by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). After a three-week placebo wash-out period, 18 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, all males, aged 41-60 years, were randomized to receive benazepril 5 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 6.25 mg, benazepril 10 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg or placebo, all given once daily for 4 weeks, according to a 3 crossover period, arranged in a 3 x 3 latin square design. Patients were checked after the wash-out period and every 4 weeks thereafter. At each visit, 24-hour ABPM was performed by a non-invasive device (Spacelabs 90202); causal BP (by mercury sphygmomanometer) and HR were also measured. Both dosages of the fixed combination were equally effective in reducing systolic and diastolic BP values throughout the 24-hour period as compared to the placebo. The antihypertensive effect of the drug could be observed to a similar extent both during the day and night and was still significant 24-hour post-dosing. In addition, the fixed combination did not affect the normal BP circadian variability.

Endothelin in mild to moderate essential hypertension: relationship between ambulatory and clinic blood pressure values.

We investigated in a post hoc analysis the relationship between plasma endothelin (ET-1) levels (immunoreactive ET-1-like material: ir-ET-1) with both casual and noninvasive 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24h ABPM) values in EH. Fifteen uncomplicated EH patients (casual supine DBP > or = 100 mmHg), 10 males, age 54 +/- 6 years, 13 previously treated, enrolled in an antihypertensive drug trial (casual DBP > or = 100 mmHg), were evaluated. After a four week single-blind placebo wash-out period, measurements of supine casual SBP and DBP (three consecutive readings) and a 24h ABPM (Spacelabs 90207; automatic reading every 15 minutes) were carried out. Plasma ir-ET-1 was measured by radioimmunoassay kit (Amersham, UK). Pearson correlation coefficient tests were used for statistical evaluations. Mean (SD) casual SBP/DBP values were 166(5)/104(2) mmHg. The 24h ABPM mean values were 148(7)/87(3) mmHg. Daytime (07.00-23.00h) and nighttime (23.00-07.00h) SBP/DBP were 153(7)/91(3) and 137(10)/78(5) mmHg, respectively. Plasma ir-ET-1 levels were 0.9(0.5) pmol/l (range 0.3-2.1 pmol/l). Plasma ir-ET-1 was not correlated with casual SBP and DBP, age, serum creatinine and duration of EH. Positive and significant correlations were observed with 24h SBP (r = 0.59), daytime SBP (r = 0.58), nighttime SBP (r = 0.53) and DBP (r = 0.60). Unlike casual BP, ABPM mean values correlate positively with plasma ir-ET-1 in mild to moderate EH.

Fibrinogen levels in normotensive and hypertensive men: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare plasma fibrinogen levels in hypertensive and normotensive men. Possible confounding factors, such as age, cholesterol levels, body-mass index and smoking habits were also to be considered. METHODS: We studied 708 men with essential hypertension (according to the World Health Organization's criteria) and 944 with normal blood pressures, all of whom had similar lifestyles; the overall age range was 18-60 years. The clinical evaluation included measurements of blood pressure, heart rate, body weight and height as well as a medical examination and personal habits history. After an overnight fast, blood samples were taken in order to measure fibrinogen and total-cholesterol levels. RESULTS: The mean fibrinogen level did not differ between the groups, although the distribution of the levels was different and was J-shaped in the hypertensive group. Plasma fibrinogen levels increased significantly with age in both groups. A significant positive correlation was found between fibrinogen and total-cholesterol levels, but not between fibrinogen and body-mass index or systolic or diastolic blood pressures. Cigarette smokers had significantly higher fibrinogen levels than non-smokers, irrespective of their blood pressure status; ex-smokers had intermediate values, suggesting a direct but reversible effect of tobacco. In cigarette smokers, fibrinogen levels increased with the number of cigarettes smoked, which is indicative of a dose-response relationship. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the strong association between fibrinogen levels and smoking and the weaker association with age and total-cholesterol levels. Mean fibrinogen level was not significantly related to blood pressure, although the distribution of fibrinogen levels appeared to be J-shaped in hypertensive men.

Evening vs morning isradipine sustained release in essential hypertension: a double-blind study with 24 h ambulatory monitoring.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study evaluated the effects on 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) of isradipine sustained release (I-SRO) administered once daily, in the morning (AM) or in the evening (PM). Eighteen uncomplicated essential hypertensives (10 men, mean age 55 +/- 6 years) with casual sitting DBP 96-110 mm Hg received, according to a triple-way crossover design, I-SRO 5 mg AM, or 5 mg PM, or placebo for 4 weeks. A 24 h ABP monitoring (Spacelabs 90207) was carried out at the end of each treatment. Twenty-four hour BP was 145.3/89.8 mm Hg after randomized placebo. AM and PM I-SRO significantly reduced 24 h BP, by 13.7/8.7 and 12.9/8.2 mm Hg respectively. Daytime (07.00 h-23.00 h) BP significantly decreased by 15.0/9.7 mm Hg with AM and 13.2/8.7 mm Hg with PM regimen; night-time BP (23.00 h-07.00 h) significantly decreased by 11.6/7.1 and 12.3/7.4 mm Hg, respectively. Nocturnal nadir BP values were 132.6/78.1 after randomized placebo, 120.9/71.4 after AM I-SRO and 121.0/72.4 mm Hg after PM I-SRO. Morning peak BP values were 154.6/96.9, 139.5/87.6 and 137.5/85.5 mm Hg, respectively. Mean BP values in the early morning hours (i.e. between 03.00 h and 08.00 h) were significantly decreased by 12.1/7.3 mm Hg after AM and 14.3/7.9 mm Hg after PM intake. No significant differences were detected in the BP lowering effect of the two I-SRO regimens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of once-a-day trandolapril by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The Italian Trandolapril Study Group.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of trandolapril on 24-hour blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After a washout period of 4 weeks, 42 patients were randomized to receive 2 mg of trandolapril once daily and 20 to receive placebo in a double-blind fashion for 6 weeks. This was followed by a second washout period of 4 weeks. At the end of each period, clinic blood pressure was assessed at 24 hours after the last dose and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was measured noninvasively, taking blood pressure readings every 15 minutes during the day and every 20 minutes during the night. Two patients were dropped out before any blood pressure evaluation under treatment. Analysis of ambulatory blood pressure was performed in 48 patients who met the criteria for the minimal number of ambulatory blood pressure data (2 values per hour during the day and 1 value per hour in the night). In the trandolapril-treated group (n = 41) clinic systolic/diastolic blood pressures were 159.8 +/- 2.0/102.4 +/- 0.8, 146.8 +/- 2.3/94.8 +/- 1.1, and 155.7 +/- 2.0/99.2 +/- 0.7 mm Hg in the pretreatment, treatment, and post-treatment periods, respectively. The corresponding values for 24-hour mean blood pressure (n = 31) were 139.5 +/- 1.9/91.2 +/- 1.5, 131.0 +/- 2.0/84.3 +/- 1.2, and 139.7 +/- 1.8/90.9 +/- 1.1 mmHg. The differences between the lower treatment, versus the higher pre- and post-treatment, values were all statistically significant (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of nifedipine and indomethacin on cough induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study.

Prostaglandins (PG) have been suggested to play a role in the genesis of cough induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and that inhibition of PG synthesis can reduce or abolish the incidence of this side effect. Moreover, experimental and clinical data suggest that nifedipine, a dihydropyridine Ca antagonist, can inhibit PG synthesis. Therefore, we wished to determine whether nifedipine can reduce cough induced by ACE-I as compared with indomethacin, a known inhibitor of PG synthesis. Fourteen hypertensive patients who developed cough during captopril chronic therapy randomly received slow-release nifedipine 20 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), indomethacin 50 mg b.i.d., and placebo b.i.d. for 1 week in a double-blind, cross-over design. At the end of each treatment phase, cough was evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire containing an ordinal scale for daily cough intensity and frequency. Indomethacin abolished or markedly reduced cough induced by ACE-I, whereas nifedipine reduced it but to a lesser degree. These findings suggest that PG can play a role in cough caused by ACE-I, and a dihydropyridine Ca antagonist can reduce the occurrence of this side effect.

Nitrendipine 20 mg once daily versus nicardipine slow release 40 mg twice daily in mild essential hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

The extent and duration of the blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of 20 mg nitrendipine (NIT) once daily and 40 mg nicardipine slow release (NIC) twice daily were compared in 12 men (aged 39-55 years) with mild essential hypertension according to a randomized, cross over study. Twenty-four-hour non invasive ambulatory BP monitoring (Spacelabs 5200) was performed at the end of a 2-week placebo run-in and after 4 weeks of each active treatment; automatic BP measurements were programmed at 15-min intervals. Both treatments significantly (p less than .01) reduced mean 24-hour and daytime systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP, but had different effects on daytime BP profiles. NIT decreased SBP and DBP (p less than .05) in 5 out of 8 two-hour subperiods (from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.), followed by a loss of effect; NIC reduced SBP and DBP (p less than .05) in 7 out of 8 two-hour subperiods (from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m.). During the night-time, NIT reduced mean SBP (p less than .05) and NIC both mean SBP and DBP values (p less than .05; p less than .05 vs NIT for SBP). Heart rate was not affected by either treatment. Thus, after short-term treatment in mild essential hypertensives nitrendipine once daily was not as effective as nicardipine slow release twice daily in reducing blood pressure throughout the 24 hours.

The effect of celiprolol on the blood lipid profile in hypertensive patients with high cholesterol levels.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of chronic antihypertensive therapy with either celiprolol or atenolol on plasma lipids in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Forty-six patients with essential hypertension and a total cholesterol (TC) concentration greater than 220 mg/dl were studied. After 1 month on placebo, patients were stratified into five classes on the basis of their plasma TC levels and then randomized to receive atenolol 100 mg/day or celiprolol 400 mg/day for 1 year. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and blood samples for evaluation of TC, HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides (TG) were taken before and after the placebo period, and every 6 months from the beginning of the active treatment. Celiprolol and atenolol caused similar reduction in BP. Both atenolol and celiprolol decreased TC. Atenolol significantly reduced HDL-C, while celiprolol increased it (p less than 0.01 at 12 months), and the difference between the two drugs was statistically significant in this regard. LDL-C levels were not significantly affected by atenolol, but were progressively reduced by celiprolol (p less than 0.05 at 6 months, p less than 0.01 at 12 months). TG rose under atenolol but was reduced by celiprolol (p less than 0.05). The results of this study show that the celiprolol-induced changes in plasma lipids may be favorable and suggest that, in hypertensive patients with high cholesterol levels, beta-blocker therapy with celiprolol may be effective in lowering BP without worsening the lipid profile.

[Evaluation of neuropsychological parameters in a group of metal mechanics occupationally exposed to radio frequencies]. / Valutazione di alcuni parametri neuropsicologici in un gruppo di lavoratori metalmeccanici professionalmente esposti a radiofrequenze.

In view of the increasing interest in electromagnetic fields, the effects on behaviour were studied in a group of foundry workers following prolonged exposure to radiofrequencies. The results of behavioural tests revealed significant differences between the exposed and control groups as regards neuropsychological performance. Anxiety and depression tests, however, indicated no pathological alterations, in contrast to previous observations. Nevertheless, the results need to be confirmed by further, more detailed studies.

Comparative effects of celiprolol, propranolol, oxprenolol, and atenolol on respiratory function in hypertensive patients with chronic obstructive lung disease.

The aim of the study was to compare the pulmonary effects of four beta-blockers with different ancillary properties: propranolol (non-beta 1 selective without ISA), oxprenolol (non-beta 1 selective with ISA), atenolol (beta 1 selective), and celipropol (beta 1 selective with mild beta 2-agonist and alpha 2-antagonist activity) in hypertensive patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. Ten asthmatic patients, all males, aged 50-66 years were studied. Entry criteria were a) DBP greater than or equal to 95 mmHg and less than or equal to 115 mmHg; b) FEV1 less than 70% of the theoretical values; c) FEV1 increase of at least 20% after salbutamol inhalation (200 micrograms). After a 2-week washout period on placebo, each patient received propranolol (80 mg/day), oxprenolol (80 mg/day), atenolol (100 mg/day), and celiprolol (200 mg/day) for 1 week, according to a randomized, cross-over design. At the end of the washout and of each treatment period, airway function, assessed by FEV1, FVC, and FEV1%, was evaluated by spirometry both in the basal condition and after salbutamol inhalation. Unlike propranolol and oxprenolol, which significantly reduced FEV1 and inhibited the bronchodilator response to inhaled salbutamol, atenolol and celiprolol did not significantly affect respiratory function and did not antagonize salbutamol effects. Celiprolol more closely approached placebo in its respiratory effects than did atenolol, although the differences were not statistically significant.

Antihypertensive activity and duration of action of dilevalol in hypertensive patients at rest and during exercise. A comparison with captopril.

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dilevalol and captopril on blood pressure and heart rate in hypertensive subjects, both at rest and during bicycle exercise. Thirty mild hypertensive patients (24 men, 6 women), aged 34-55, were studied in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial. After a 3-week placebo run-in, patients were randomized to receive either dilevalol (200 mg once daily) or captopril (50 mg twice daily) for 4 weeks. Dilevalol-treated patients whose diastolic blood pressure had not decreased by more than 8 mmHg from baseline (or to less than 95 mmHg) were given 400 mg once daily for a further 2 weeks. Treatment was stopped for all other patients. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at rest and during bicycle exercise tests 4 ("peak") and 24 hours ("trough") after dosing in the dilevalol group and 4 ("peak") and 12 hours ("trough") after dosing in the captopril group. At the end of the placebo run-in, mean resting blood pressure was 156/102 mmHg in the dilevalol group and 157/103 in the captopril group. Six patients had blood pressure normalization with captopril and 9 with dilevalol 200 mg; a further 2 patients achieved normalized blood pressure levels with dilevalol 400 mg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Benazepril at incremental doses in essential hypertension.

The antihypertensive effect of the new non-sulphydryl ACE-inhibitor benzepril was studied in 30 patients (16 men, 14 women; mean age 50 +/- 7 years) with essential hypertension at WHO stage I or II. After a 2-week placebo treatment, patients with lying diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than or equal to 95 mmHg were given benzepril 10 mg once daily for 2 weeks. At the end of this period, patients with lying DBP less than 95 mmHg continued with the same dosage, while those with lying DBP greater than or equal to 95 mmHg were blindly up-titrated to benazepril 20 mg once daily. In both cases treatment was continued for further 4 weeks. BP was measured every two weeks 24-26 h after last drug administration. After the run-in period, mean group lying BP was 160/104 +/- 8/5 mmHg. Benazepril significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) and DBP, both supine and standing (p less than 0.01), while heart rate (HR) did not change. After the first 2 weeks, 13 patients (43%) had lying DBP less than 95 mmHg ("fast responders"), while 17 patients (57%) had DBP greater than or equal to 95 mmHg. By increasing the dosage to 20 mg, a further 5 patients became responder and mean group blood pressure in patients up-titrated with benazepril dropped significantly (-16/-10 mmHg from baseline; p less than 0.01, "slow responders"). Fast responders were younger (47 +/- 5 vs 54 +/- 8 years), had lower baseline BP (160/99 +/- 4/3 vs 173/107 +/- 7/3) and had shorter duration of hypertension (20 +/- 14 vs 61 +/- 27 months) than "slow responders".(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)